Memory Systems · Non-Declarative

Non-Associative Learning (Habituation and Sensitization)

Example

The first time the upstairs neighbor drops something you startle. By the fourth week you do not hear it. Nothing was learned about the noise, and you could not report how many times it happened. The response to it changed.

01

Non-Associative Learning in Humans

Definition

Repeated exposure to a stimulus changes the response to it, with no pairing between stimuli and no record of the individual presentations required; what changes is the response. Habituation is a response decrement to repeated stimulation that cannot be attributed to sensory adaptation or motor fatigue, and it comes in a short-term form lasting minutes to hours and a long-term form lasting days or weeks (⁠Rankin et al., 2009⁠). Sensitization is the increment, typically following intense or noxious stimulation; the two are treated as independent processes that sum to produce the observed response (⁠Groves & Thompson, 1970⁠), and a response can show facilitation before it decrements when both are active (⁠Rankin et al., 2009⁠).

  • Habituation is a response decrement to repeated stimulation that cannot be attributed to sensory adaptation or motor fatigue (Rankin et al., 2009).
  • Sensitization is the increment, typically following intense or noxious stimulation, and the two can operate concurrently on the same response.

Scope: The consensus characterisation (⁠Rankin et al., 2009⁠) covers habituation and dishabituation only; sensitization was excluded from the 2007 workshop and rests here on the dual-process account (Groves & Thompson, 1970). The cellular account of habituation in Aplysia is contested within the field, including by a Rankin co-author, and the row treats it as the best-characterized case rather than a settled one.

Neural Substrate

The cellular evidence is non-human: Aplysia for the synaptic mechanism, rat and mouse for the mammalian circuit. Human evidence exists only at the level of lesion effects on long-term habituation. In Aplysia, short-term habituation of the gill-withdrawal reflex results from a presynaptic decrease in the number of transmitter quanta released per impulse at sensory-to-motor synapses, with postsynaptic receptor sensitivity unchanged (⁠Castellucci & Kandel, 1974⁠). The mammalian acoustic startle response is mediated by a short brainstem circuit in which giant neurons of the caudal pontine reticular nucleus (PnC) receive converging sensory input and project directly to motor neurons (⁠Koch, 1999⁠; ⁠Simons-Weidenmaier et al., 2006⁠). Short-term habituation is intrinsic to that pathway: it is synaptic depression at the terminals of sensory afferents onto PnC neurons, upstream of multimodal integration, and it is specific to the stimulated modality both at the synapse and in behavior (⁠Simons-Weidenmaier et al., 2006⁠). That is the same locus identified in the invertebrate work, presynaptic and on the sensory side, though the molecular mechanism in the mammalian case remains unresolved. Sensitization is a separate modulation that raises response magnitude (⁠Koch, 1999⁠), with a neuronal substrate distinct from habituation's (⁠Groves & Thompson, 1970⁠).

In humans, patients with midline cerebellar lesions show intact short-term habituation of the startle blink within a session but impaired long-term habituation across days, indicating that the two forms depend on different substrates (⁠Maschke et al., 2000⁠). All of this concerns habituation of a reflex. Habituation to complex or cognitive stimuli, which is where the everyday example sits, is less well localized.

02

AI at a Glance

Habituation reduces responding to a stimulus that has been repeated, without sensory or motor fatigue (⁠Rankin et al., 2009⁠). Language models have no component that does this: the repetition penalty is a fixed configured discount rather than a learned change (⁠Keskar et al., 2019⁠), and many-shot jailbreaking increases responding to a new item after repeated demonstrations of the same kind (Anil et al., 2024).

  • Repetition penalty: a sampling setting that discounts the score of any token that has already appeared in the generated text by a fixed factor, so it is less likely to be chosen again (⁠Keskar et al., 2019⁠).
  • Many-shot jailbreaking: prompting a model with hundreds of fabricated examples of a behavior so that it produces that behavior on a new request it would otherwise refuse (⁠Anil et al., 2024⁠).
03

Non-Associative Learning in AI

How Far It Has Been Measured

Measurement in AI: Indirectly Measured

AI Memory Performance: Comparison Not Possible

Where It Lives in the System

Weights, Context, Memory layer, Product level. Absent at all four. Weights: fixed while the system runs, so nothing accumulates across exposures. Context: earlier turns persist within a session as content, and repeated material raises rather than lowers the probability of the demonstrated response (⁠Anil et al., 2024⁠). Memory layer: stores retrievable content, not response strength. Product level: the repetition penalty (⁠Keskar et al., 2019⁠) lowers the probability of a token once it has appeared, but it is a fixed configured discount with no accumulation and no decay, and no published work tests it against the habituation criteria.

What Has Been Measured

  • No study located gives an AI system the habituation paradigm psychologists use, which checks a response decrement against the defining hallmarks (stimulus specificity, spontaneous recovery, dishabituation); nothing was found for training, the current conversation, or saved memory (stored notes an assistant can look up later), so existing work measures related effects under other names or in only one of these places (⁠Rankin et al., 2009⁠).
  • Within the context window, meaning the text a model can see in the current conversation, GPT-2 and BART showed a sensitization-like "self-reinforcement effect": the more times a sentence had already been repeated, the more likely the model was to produce it again, a pattern studied as a text-generation flaw, not as learning (⁠Xu et al., 2022⁠).
  • A peer-reviewed security paper tested chatbots by the name habituation: repeatedly exposing a model to a request, or escalating it in small steps, raised average jailbreak success (getting the model past its safety rules) from 0.1 to 0.5 and from 0.2 to 0.4; the abstract does not report which models were tested or how they differed, and there was no human baseline or hallmark testing (Zhang et al., 2024).
  • In training, a 2026 preprint on a single small open model (1.1 billion parameters) reported "progressive adversarial sensitization": ten rounds of preference tuning raised jailbreak rates by 20%, an analogy to kindling rather than a test of the behavioral definition, with no human comparison (⁠Cheung, 2026⁠).
  • The closest same-task comparison had 100 people and GPT-2 predict the next word of passages repeated up to four times: agreement was high on first reading (r = .87) but fell to r = .05 by the third, because GPT-2 became near-perfect after one repetition while people improved gradually; only one AI model was tested, so no spread across systems can be given (⁠Vaidya et al., 2023⁠).
  • That comparison cannot be used for a rating: it measures memory for repeated text (closer to repetition priming) rather than a waning or growing response, and GPT-2 could still see the earlier passage while people saw words one at a time and had to remember them, so the AI's better score only favours the side the test was easier for (⁠Vaidya et al., 2023⁠).
  • Response suppression to repeated input has been shown in AI mainly when researchers build it in: an image-recognition network given built-in suppression reproduced adaptation aftereffects seen in people, but this is sensory adaptation, which the psychology definition separates from habituation, and the component is not part of today's AI assistants (⁠Vinken et al., 2020⁠).

Purpose and Execution of Memory: Foundational Differences Between Human and AI Memory Architectures, and Implications

Elizabeth K. Bayardelle, PhD and Jennifer L. Thompson, PhD

About & How to Cite