Sources

542 sources

Source

Binz & Schulz (2023)

Using cognitive psychology to understand GPT-3

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 120(6)

Find It

DOI

Abstract

We study GPT-3, a recent large language model, using tools from cognitive psychology. More specifically, we assess GPT-3's decision-making, information search, deliberation, and causal reasoning abilities on a battery of canonical experiments from the literature. We find that much of GPT-3's behavior is impressive: It solves vignette-based tasks similarly or better than human subjects, is able to make decent decisions from descriptions, outperforms humans in a multiarmed bandit task, and shows signatures of model-based reinforcement learning. Yet, we also find that small perturbations to vignette-based tasks can lead GPT-3 vastly astray, that it shows no signatures of directed exploration, and that it fails miserably in a causal reasoning task. Taken together, these results enrich our understanding of current large language models and pave the way for future investigations using tools from cognitive psychology to study increasingly capable and opaque artificial agents.

Reference

Binz, M., & Schulz, E. (2023). Using cognitive psychology to understand GPT-3. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 120(6), e2218523120. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2218523120

What Rests on This

1 mechanism cites this source. Each finding below is quoted as it appears on that mechanism's own page.

Instrumental Learning Memory Systems

  • Measured in AI

    GPT-3 on the horizon bandit task was indistinguishable from people with short horizons (p = .97) but earned significantly lower regret overall (M = 2.72 vs 3.24, human SD = 10.26), with past outcomes shown in the prompt; this result is not used because the human data come from a conference abstract (Zaller et al., 2021) whose sample size and procedure the paper does not report