Sources

542 sources

Source

Klingelhöfer-Jens et al. (2022)

Robust group- but limited individual-level (longitudinal) reliability and insights into cross-phases response prediction of conditioned fear

eLife, 11

Find It

DOI

Abstract

Here, we follow the call to target measurement reliability as a key prerequisite for individual-level predictions in translational neuroscience by investigating (1) longitudinal reliability at the individual and (2) group level, (3) internal consistency and (4) response predictability across experimental phases. One hundred and twenty individuals performed a fear conditioning paradigm twice 6 months apart. Analyses of skin conductance responses, fear ratings and blood oxygen level dependent functional magnetic resonance imaging (BOLD fMRI) with different data transformations and included numbers of trials were conducted. While longitudinal reliability was rather limited at the individual level, it was comparatively higher for acquisition but not extinction at the group level. Internal consistency was satisfactory. Higher responding in preceding phases predicted higher responding in subsequent experimental phases at a weak to moderate level depending on data specifications. In sum, the results suggest that while individual-level predictions are meaningful for (very) short time frames, they also call for more attention to measurement properties in the field.

Reference

Klingelhöfer-Jens, M., Ehlers, M. R., Kuhn, M., Keyaniyan, V., & Lonsdorf, T. B. (2022). Robust group- but limited individual-level (longitudinal) reliability and insights into cross-phases response prediction of conditioned fear. eLife, 11. https://doi.org/10.7554/elife.78717

What Rests on This

1 mechanism cites this source. Each finding below is quoted as it appears on that mechanism's own page.

Classical Conditioning Memory Systems

  • Measured in humans

    When 107 adults completed the same fear-conditioning paradigm and 71 repeated it six months later, conditioning was robust at the group level, but individual-level test-retest reliability of skin conductance responses was limited (intraclass correlations about 0.03 to 0.61 depending on analysis choices)