Sources

542 sources

Source

Devaluez et al. (2023)

Episodic and semantic feeling-of-knowing in aging: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Scientific Reports, 13(1)

Find It

DOI

Abstract

AbstractA complex pattern of preservation and deterioration in metacognition in aging is found, especially regarding predicting future memory retrieval (i.e., feeling-of-knowing, FOK). While semantic FOK (sFOK) is preserved with age, studies on episodic tasks (eFOK) produce equivocal findings. We present a meta-analysis of 20 studies on eFOK and sFOK, analyzing the difference in metacognitive sensitivity between 922 younger and 966 older adults, taking into account the difference in memory performance. The sFOK studies yielded no overall age effect (8 effects, g = −0.10 [−0.29, 0.10]). However, we found a reliable age-group difference on eFOK (22 effects, g = 0.53 [0.28, 0.78]), which was moderated when considering recognition performance. Moreover, using aggregated data of 134 young and 235 older adults from published and unpublished studies from our lab, we investigated memory performance as an explanation of the eFOK deficit. We show that older adults are less metacognitively sensitive than younger adults for eFOKs which is, at least partly, due to the age-related memory decline. We highlight two non-exclusive explanations: a recollection deficit at play in the first and second order tasks, and a confound between first order performance and the measure used to assess metacognitive sensitivity.

Reference

Devaluez, M., Mazancieux, A., & Souchay, C. (2023). Episodic and semantic feeling-of-knowing in aging: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Scientific Reports, 13(1). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-36251-9

What Rests on This

1 mechanism cites this source. Each finding below is quoted as it appears on that mechanism's own page.

Feeling of Knowing Metacognition

  • Measured in humans

    The standard test is the recall–judgment–recognition procedure with general-knowledge questions (semantic FOK) or studied word pairs (episodic FOK); every study in the one meta-analysis scored accuracy as the within-person gamma correlation between FOK ratings and later recognition

  • Measured in humans

    That meta-analysis of 20 studies (922 younger, 966 older adults) found no age difference in semantic FOK accuracy (g = -0.10 [-0.29, 0.10]) but lower episodic FOK accuracy in older adults (g = 0.53 [0.28, 0.78]), partly explained by their weaker recognition memory