Sources

542 sources

Source

Huang et al. (2025)

On the Failure of Latent State Persistence in Large Language Models

arXiv

Find It

DOI

Abstract

While Large Language Models (LLMs) exhibit remarkable reasoning abilities, we demonstrate that they fundamentally lack a core aspect of human cognition: working memory. Human working memory is an active cognitive system that enables not only the temporary storage of information but also its processing and utilization. Without working memory, individuals may produce unrealistic conversations, exhibit self-contradictions, and struggle with tasks that require mental reasoning. Existing evaluations using N-back or context-dependent tasks fail as they allow LLMs to exploit external context rather than retaining the reasoning process in the latent space. We introduce three novel tasks—(1) Number Guessing, (2) Yes-No Deduction, and (3) Math Magic—that isolate internal representation from external context. Across seventeen frontier models spanning four major model families, we consistently observe irrational or contradictory behaviors, highlighting LLMs' inability to retain and manipulate latent information. Our work establishes a new benchmark for evaluating working memory in LLMs and identifies this deficit as a critical obstacle to artificial general intelligence. Code and prompts will be made publicly available upon publication.

Reference

Huang, J. T., Sun, K., Wang, W., & Dredze, M. (2025). On the failure of latent state persistence in large language models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2505.10571.

What Rests on This

1 mechanism cites this source. Each finding below is quoted as it appears on that mechanism's own page.

Working Memory Memory Systems

  • Measured in AI

    When information must be held without being written into the conversation, models fail: across 17 models, most could not keep a secretly chosen number consistent across questions, and a hidden-arithmetic task was solved by at most 26% without step-by-step writing, rising to 100% only when a reasoning model wrote its steps out (a preprint, with no human data)