Sources

542 sources

Source

Orban et al. (2022)

Verbal Memory Interference in Attention-Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder: A Meta-Analytic Review

Journal of Attention Disorders, 26(12), 1549-1562

Find It

DOI

Abstract

Objective: Interference control is used to overcome conflict among competing memory representations and may contribute to memory difficulties in ADHD. This meta-analytic review examined memory interference to evaluate susceptibility to proactive, retroactive, and memory control interference among those with ADHD. Method: Twenty studies (1987–2019) examining verbal memory interference in ADHD met inclusion criteria (age: 8–36 years). Proactive and retroactive interference indices were extracted from list-learning tasks, and memory control indices were extracted from experimental paradigms (e.g., directed-forgetting). Results: Children with ADHD were less affected by proactive interference ( g=−0.53, 95% CI [−0.75, −0.31]), whereas no significant differences were found in adults ( g=0.13, 95% CI [−0.02, 0.28]). Adults and children with ADHD exhibited more retroactive interference ( g=0.17, 95% CI [0.05, 0.29]) and performed worse on memory control tasks ( g=0.35, 95% CI [0.08, 0.62]) relative to controls. Conclusion: Differences in verbal memory interference control in ADHD were observed but effects were different depending upon interference type and participant age.

Reference

Orban, S. A., Festini, S. B., Yuen, E. K., & Friedman, L. M. (2022). Verbal Memory Interference in Attention-Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder: A Meta-Analytic Review. Journal of Attention Disorders, 26(12), 1549-1562. https://doi.org/10.1177/10870547221085515

What Rests on This

1 mechanism cites this source. Each finding below is quoted as it appears on that mechanism's own page.

Retrieval Interference Memory Processes

  • Measured in humans

    Proactive and retroactive interference indices from list-learning tasks are standard enough to be meta-analysed: across 20 studies, adults with ADHD did not differ from controls on proactive interference (g = 0.13, 95% CI -0.02 to 0.28), while people with ADHD showed slightly more retroactive interference (g = 0.17)