Sources

542 sources

Source

Huet et al. (2025)

Episodic Memories Generation and Evaluation Benchmark for Large Language Models

arXiv

Find It

DOI

Abstract

Episodic memory -- the ability to recall specific events grounded in time and space -- is a cornerstone of human cognition, enabling not only coherent storytelling, but also planning and decision-making. Despite their remarkable capabilities, Large Language Models (LLMs) lack a robust mechanism for episodic memory: we argue that integrating episodic memory capabilities into LLM is essential for advancing AI towards human-like cognition, increasing their potential to reason consistently and ground their output in real-world episodic events, hence avoiding confabulations. To address this challenge, we introduce a comprehensive framework to model and evaluate LLM episodic memory capabilities. Drawing inspiration from cognitive science, we develop a structured approach to represent episodic events, encapsulating temporal and spatial contexts, involved entities, and detailed descriptions. We synthesize a unique episodic memory benchmark, free from contamination, and release open source code and datasets to assess LLM performance across various recall and episodic reasoning tasks. Our evaluation of state-of-the-art models, including GPT-4 and Claude variants, Llama 3.1, and o1-mini, reveals that even the most advanced LLMs struggle with episodic memory tasks, particularly when dealing with multiple related events or complex spatio-temporal relationships -- even in contexts as short as 10k-100k tokens.

Reference

Huet, A., Ben Houidi, Z., & Rossi, D. (2025). Episodic memories generation and evaluation benchmark for large language models. In Proceedings of the Thirteenth International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR 2025).

What Rests on This

1 mechanism cites this source. Each finding below is quoted as it appears on that mechanism's own page.

Episodic Memory Memory Systems

  • Measured in AI

    A peer-reviewed benchmark with no human baseline asked models to recall events by time, place, entity, and content from a synthetic book of about 100,000 tokens; with one matching event F1 (a combined accuracy score from 0 to 1) ranged from 0.05 (o1-mini) to 0.81 (GPT-4o) with the book in view, every model fell to 0.60 or less once two or more events matched the cue, and no model recalled the complete set of events for more than 18% of multi-event questions