Sources

542 sources

Source

Koriat & Goldsmith (1996)

Monitoring and control processes in the strategic regulation of memory accuracy.

Psychological Review, 103(3), 490-517

Find It

DOI

Abstract

When people are allowed freedom to volunteer or withhold information, they can enhance the accuracy of their memory reports substantially relative to forced-report performance. A theoretical framework addressing the strategic regulation of memory reporting is put forward that delineates the mediating role of metamemorial monitoring and control processes. Although the enhancement of memory accuracy is generally accompanied by a reduction in memory quantity, experimental and simulation results indicate that both of these effects depend critically on (a) accuracy incentive and ( b ) monitoring effectiveness. The results are discussed with regard to the contribution of metamemory processes to memory performance, and a general methodology is proposed that incorporates these processes into the assessment of memory-accuracy and memory-quantity performance. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved)

Reference

Koriat, A., & Goldsmith, M. (1996). Monitoring and control processes in the strategic regulation of memory accuracy. Psychological review, 103(3), 490.

What Rests on This

1 mechanism cites this source. Each finding below is quoted as it appears on that mechanism's own page.

Metacognitive Control Metacognition

  • Measured in humans

    The standard report-option paradigm compares forced report with free report, in which people may withhold answers; free report raises accuracy substantially, usually at some cost in quantity, and both effects depend on the accuracy incentive and on how well confidence tracks correctness