Sources

542 sources

Source

Hu et al. (2025)

Evaluating Memory in LLM Agents via Incremental Multi-Turn Interactions

arXiv

Find It

DOI

Abstract

Recent benchmarks for Large Language Model (LLM) agents primarily focus on evaluating reasoning, planning, and execution capabilities, while another critical component-memory, encompassing how agents memorize, update, and retrieve long-term information-is under-evaluated due to the lack of benchmarks. We term agents with memory mechanisms as memory agents. In this paper, based on classic theories from memory science and cognitive science, we identify four core competencies essential for memory agents: accurate retrieval, test-time learning, long-range understanding, and selective forgetting. Existing benchmarks either rely on limited context lengths or are tailored for static, long-context settings like book-based QA, which do not reflect the interactive, multi-turn nature of memory agents that incrementally accumulate information. Moreover, no existing benchmarks cover all four competencies. We introduce MemoryAgentBench, a new benchmark specifically designed for memory agents. Our benchmark transforms existing long-context datasets and incorporates newly constructed datasets into a multi-turn format, effectively simulating the incremental information processing characteristic of memory agents. By carefully selecting and curating datasets, our benchmark provides comprehensive coverage of the four core memory competencies outlined above, thereby offering a systematic and challenging testbed for assessing memory quality. We evaluate a diverse set of memory agents, ranging from simple context-based and retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) systems to advanced agents with external memory modules and tool integration. Empirical results reveal that current methods fall short of mastering all four competencies, underscoring the need for further research into comprehensive memory mechanisms for LLM agents.

Reference

Hu, Y., Wang, Y., & McAuley, J. (2025). Evaluating Memory in LLM Agents via Incremental Multi-Turn Interactions. arXiv preprint arXiv:2507.05257. https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.2507.05257

What Rests on This

2 mechanisms cite this source. Each finding below is quoted as it appears on that mechanism's own page.

Reconsolidation Memory Processes

  • Measured in AI

    A 2025 benchmark preprint tested whether agents overwrite older facts with newer contradicting ones: on single-fact questions scores ranged from 7% (Zep) to 78% (GPT-5-mini), and on multi-step questions every system scored 28% or lower, with most at 2-7%; no human baseline was reported

Motivated Forgetting Memory Processes

  • Measured in AI

    Agent memory benchmarks test forgetting outdated facts when they are replaced (selective forgetting in MemoryAgentBench, a 2025 preprint), finding that no tested system masters it, but they include no human baseline